Andrew Cavenagh's Disappointment: A Year of Challenges at Rangers
Andrew Cavenagh leans into the word “disappointment” like it’s a challenge rather than a confession.
A year on from leading the consortium that took control of Rangers, the American businessman has no trophy, no settled football structure, and no illusions about how far short the club has fallen. What he does have, he insists, is total commitment.
“Rangers occupies 150% of my thoughts,” he says. It sounds like a line, until he keeps going.
“This club gets into you at the molecular level. And, once it's done, you're done. It's happened to me and a bunch of us.”
A turbulent first year in charge
Twelve months ago, Cavenagh and 49ers Enterprises arrived with scale and ambition. A fresh investment era. New ideas. New faces. The kind of takeover that usually comes wrapped in optimism and bold projections.
Instead, Rangers delivered chaos.
Russell Martin was appointed head coach in June. By October, he was gone. The clear-out didn’t stop there. Chief executive Patrick Stewart and sporting director Kevin Thelwell were both removed the following month as the new regime ripped up its own first draft.
Danny Rohl stepped in and, for a while, the story threatened to change. He dragged Rangers back into the title race, rebuilt some belief, and gave the season a pulse again. But when it mattered most, the team fell away. Four defeats in the final five games turned a revival into a collapse.
It left Rangers empty-handed. Again.
Cavenagh has not tried to dress that up. He told BBC Scotland last week that the season had been “incredibly disappointing” and had “left a terrible taste in everyone's mouths”. He is not softening that now.
No regrets, no escape route
Up to £40m was spent on players. No trophy came back in return. For many owners, that kind of equation can trigger doubt, or at least a quiet reassessment of how deep they really want to go.
Asked if he had ever wondered why he bothered getting involved, Cavenagh cut that off quickly.
No, is the answer,” he said.
There was no caveat, no carefully crafted escape route. Just a blunt refusal to entertain the idea.
“I don't ever want to use the words ‘enjoy’ or ‘fun’ because you can't have a season like we've had and use those words,” he added. The line is telling. This is not the wide-eyed, early-days honeymoon talk of a new investor. It is the voice of someone who has just had a brutal education in what running Rangers actually means.
But he is not backing away from it.
“The challenge is something I relish and Paraag [Marathe] relishes with the rest of us. The disappointment this year is very real for us, but all it's done is provide motivation for us going forward.”
For Cavenagh, the pain is not a warning sign. It is fuel.
He talks about this season as something that will “spur us on to where we want to get to” and “make success sweeter”. That is the bet he is making: that the scars of this year harden the club rather than hollow it out.
Facing the fans, not hiding from them
One thing Cavenagh has not done is disappear into the directors’ box. He has been visible, often deliberately so, among match-going supporters. He has stood in the stands, walked the streets, and taken questions in the rawest possible setting – face to face with people who are tired of excuses.
Most recently, he engaged with fans at the final fixture of the season at Falkirk. Not the easiest backdrop for a conversation, but he welcomed it.
“My conversations with our supporters, I've really come to enjoy,” he said.
He knows how that sounds after a year like this, and he knows what “enjoy” does and doesn’t mean in this context. It’s not about light-hearted exchanges. It’s about connection, and confrontation when necessary.
“Someone told me I should get to know them on a one-by-one basis. At Falkirk, that probably wasn't the right medium to do that,” he admitted, with a nod to the intensity of that environment.
Still, he keeps going back to the same point: shared standards.
“But whether it's in the stands or the streets, we all share certain things like the ambition to win and the understanding that we're not good enough.
The common goal is the same so there's common ground in those conversations even if there are disagreements over methods.”
That line – “the understanding that we're not good enough” – cuts through. It is rare to hear an owner put it so plainly. No talk of “fine margins” or “nearly there”. Just an acceptance that Rangers, as they stand, fall short of where Rangers must be.
The question now is simple and ruthless: does this regime turn that honesty into change, or does another year of regret follow the last?






